I read with interests on this shadowfox post.
From my last two posts on Nuffnang, it seems that Robb Chew is now officially practising the silent response method to all posts which may be deemed negative by him. But by doing so to xblogger.net, he will officially now be known as someone who bullies the weak even though he is rather weak with legal matters himself. So I suppose I can call him Dumbo right? No, not the elephant Dumbo, that would be an insult to the Disney character, but rather low IQ, dimwitted, etc. I will give Robb one last chance for him to have his say, otherwise I will deem that whatever I have said is true. I believe 3 warning posts on him to have his stand is quite reasonable. I believe he couldn’t answer my queries because it force him to an embarassing corner. If he truly believe what he has written, surely answering my queries would be as easy as ABC.
Now, this shadowfox post is interesting as I noticed that in recent times, you see all this kap chais coming out and telling the world how Advertlets are not paying them. And you will probably notice that these people are mainly from Malaysia. These are usually the pimpled face kids who probably haven’t earned their days keep in their entire life. Yet they can say things like how they use to like Advertlets and now Advertlets sucks just because there is more “unanswered” queries on the blogosphere about Nuffnang’s bully tactic.
It didn’t originate from yours truly, but rather being picked up from here. Fact that I noticed that their PR skills are lacking wasn’t just within the last few days but quite some moons ago. For one, I believe it is their sheer arrogance that they feel they are the premier blog ads aggregators that have cultivate themselves into this mould. Timothy the founder of Nuffnang has superb marketing skills, but naturally he couldn’t be everywhere at the same time, so a few gremlims managed to steal the limelight and now do not know how to react to the publicity generated by their “wrong doings” of bullying the weaker people. Timothy, if you are reading this, you know I have followed your blogs eons ago and I do wish you sincerely all the best in your business, but I do hope that you would not practice “bullying the weak” as what had transpire in Robb’s last foray into bad publicity.
The other thing about what Shadowfox had written about click fraud on Advertlets. Yes, I think that theory is quite possible. My busy bees have been telling me about this group who operates in Malaysia that inter click one another’s ads to make money from Google. They would attempt to click fraud others like I had been once. But thanks to Google vigilance, they knew it was someone trying to sabotage my ads. Hell, unlike shadowfox who has no ads, these ads are a good pocket money. And most of these pocket money are given directly to my kids. If I have to survive on ads for real money, i would have died of starvation faster than someone in Etophia. But these groups do survive on blog ads for their main source of income. Let me furnish further on Shadowfox claims. Just look at the shareholders of Nuffnang, then you will get what I mean. Busy Bees told me that he had been invited to join the gang but politely rejected it because it was outright unethical. But these people within the group continue to tell the world how ethical they can be and they abhor any unethical conducts even though they have been practising so for the last dunno how many years. These people will have retribution one. I curse curse curse them (hmmm.. i think i had curse someone like this before) and make sure they go to the 18th level of Hell. LOL, just a note, I don’t normally curse someone like this unless they are deemed 100% hypocrite by me.
I am asking Tim to take a look at your post so that he can reply to this accordingly. And a friendly warning: don’t associate yourself with anonymous lanjiao bastards like “ShadowFox”, because he is going to get himself sued left, right and centre by yours truly for libel. Once I am done with him he won’t even have enough money to pay for entering a public toilet.
- MENJ
That would be nice. I don’t want Robb Chew to avoid answering my queries.
As to associating myself with Shadowfox, I have noted what he had said and in many ways I agree with what he hsa said though I do not echo it in my blogs. MenJ, I hope you are not part of the syndicate that click fraud as your name had never been mentioned by my busy bees. But let’s put it this way, if there is smoke, I am sure there is fire somewhere.
MenJ, again, allow me to give you a word of advice. It is never easy to sue someone. Personally, if you go ask lawyers if they are willing to sue the banks, they will tell you NO. because the banks can potentially be one of their largest customers on sheer volumes. I won’t issue the threat of law suit unless I have concrete evidence and can prove material loss. Read my previous post for further details.
While one is free to pen down whatever they like, but they have to be responsible. Just like I have to be responsible whether I am anonymous or not. I do not write on speculations or rumours but rather informations which can be easily obtainable from media or blogosphere. My post to Robb has been his casual use of defamation law suit which I feel it very unethical as it is a “bullying the weak” tactic.
Menj,
Quick la, I’ve been waiting for you to file the suit against shadowfox ever since you threatened to do so months ago.
As wise old man say,
“Don’t say, do”
Bah, This Robb Chew fella is just a kid. He did his Diploma in PR at Tunku Abdul Rahman College. He’s just a small fry. Scared shitless and his PR skills are worthless. I know it, cuz i know him. lol =D